This is such a confusing statement and they aren’t saying it in these words: Yet this is what I hear….and so I wonder: What do they hear?
Before we get into this, I will warn you that this is going to end in a talk about vaccination, so if you don’t want to hear about this, please Stop reading…but I do ask you to in the very least look up the legal term: Unavoidably Unsafe, and read the package Insert, especially with HEP B shot and HPV shot…two things that are not airborne thus really can be stopped in other ways!!!
Web MD talks about how we get HEP B:
Web MD talks about how we get HPV:
I get slightly irritated, but knew it was coming, as it always does…people poising their lawns in order to have a beautifully neat lawn. Then I think, how many people spray these poisons into the air? It’s a lot, and thus the reason for me building my walipini in order to avoid the air picking up these toxins and spraying them all over my food. I have come up with a solution for other peoples actions. (This is what vaccinations use to claim to do…and still claim if you are going on your mission)
What am I getting at: Life is unavoidably unsafe. If you have ever watched 1000 ways to die you know how true this statement is….So what do we do? We pass the crap out of laws…seriously…way too many laws…and way too many passed with emotions rather than using logic. As a people I believe we must think logically when we pass any law that strips away peoples freedoms…Especially when you are putting a person in harm’s way. Example: Medicine.
When it comes to Medicine we must be even more careful, why? Because most medicine is deemed Unavoidably Unsafe.
Let’s first look at the “legal” definition of Unavoidably Unsafe: This is taken from Findlaw.com (because I am not an attorney)
We (the people) ask: shouldn’t a manufacturer be held liable if His/her product causes an injury to you or a loved one? (yes and no…more often no when it comes to medicine) But why and how: Well if a product has been legally qualified as “unavoidably unsafe” then by definition the product is not defective, even though it might cause injury.
How does a product come to be Unavoidably Unsafe, thus not liable to be completely safe? Again, according to findlaw.com, it usually must meet four criteria: Preparation, Marketing, Utility vs. Risk, and Available Alternatives. If you would like to know more about these four criteria please see the article here. http://injury.findlaw.com/product-liability/what-is-an-unavoidably-unsafe-product.html
Note: Under Utility vs. Risk they write: The third requirement is that the utility or usefulness of the product must outweigh its risk of danger. So, for example, if a drug cures a mild case of hiccups but causes death in half the people who use it, it may not qualify as unavoidably unsafe. It is worth noting that a product need not save lives to be considered useful. Products ranging from birth control medications to beauty products have been found to be sufficiently useful to warrant the risk associated with their use.
I am confused by any beauty product being worth the risk…but this is neither here nor there.
So now onto vaccinations. We know two things: Vaccinations don’t always work. Vaccinations are labeled as Unavoidably Unsafe. (These are scientific fact)
For these reasons alone we should never “force” another human being into taking a vaccination. It should remain a decision between the parent, the child, and their medical doctor, it should not be something decided by a hand full of people who can and have been influenced by money.
If you don’t believe the FDA or the CDC or the WHO or any other “medical” field can be influenced by money….Please see Vioxx: It killed 60,000 people before it was pulled from the market. (This is the most modest number I found, some ranged much, much higher)
Please see the following testimony in the Burzynski Case: I will leave the link below. The father did give his daughter cancer therapy treatment. The child sadly died, but not before suffering from the treatment. The parents had to wear gloves when changing her diaper because her urine was so toxic. .... Shouldn’t a parent, when faced with such a harsh decision: either medicine so toxic they have to wear gloves or maybe going nonwestern medicine, be able to decide? (Either way this poor child died...she didn't die of the cancer...she died of the treatment)
Please see the CDC’s own report about the overuse of antibiotics causing “super-bugs” They admit that 2 million people are getting infected with resistant strains and of these23,000 a Year are dying!!! Yet….antibiotics are still over used???? WHY???
I’m going to ask you all a question: Does one cigarette kill you? Does one X-ray kill you? Does inhaling asbestos one time kill you? Does one beer kill you? Does over indulging in food once or twice a year kill you?
Maybe…Maybe there is a person out there who died from a single cigarette, again going back to 1000 ways to die…You can die from just about anything.
Example: I am allergic to bees…not fun, but that is life…Life is risk.
So here is my question: Let us assume Herd Immunity through Vaccination is true (which it’s not…but I will leave that for another time)….And we know that vaccinations are unavoidably unsafe…Could it be that when you Demand for everyone to be Vaccinated you are saying:
“You must risk the health of your child in order to protect mine?”
That is what I hear…and even if the risk is remote…the risks are real. Just like the risk of dying from Chicken Pox is remote…the risk was still there (about 100 a year)
Regardless of how people feel about vaccination, this is what I know: People tend not to think about this issue until they have a personal experience of having a vaccination harm you or someone you love. You start to feel alone and isolated…as though your child doesn’t matter because More people are “supposedly” helped than harmed.
Now before you go half cocked and spout out: Well that is what medical exceptions are for…I want to direct your attention toward the cdc’s Guide to vaccine contraindications and Precautions. As a parent I strongly recommend that you read it. WHY?
Sometimes doctors make mistakes, they are only human after all. It clearly states on page 2 you are NOT to give vaccines if the child has an allergy to ANY vaccine component. I ask, how do they know if a child is allergic to all components in HEP B shot that is given the day of birth? Page 16 Ingredients are:
Then I would ask yourself the following. If you look at Appendix C: Reaction after a Previous Dose of Diphtheira-Tetanus or Pertussis Containing Vaccine on page 22: Go down to Guillain-Barre syndrome: for DTaP, Tdap, and Td/DT see: c4 and c5 which is on page 23: It reads: The decision to give additional doses of DTap should be based on consideration of benefits of further vaccination vs. the risk of recurrence of GBS. For example, completion of the primary series in children is justified.
Guillain-Barre Syndrome definition from Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary Ed. 20:
A rare neurological illness, affecting 1 to 2 persons per 100,000, marked by ascending paralysis. The loss of motor function begins in the extremities and may quickly rise to include the respiratory muscles, causing respiratory failure. The loss of motor function can occur in a few days to 2 to 3 weeks. Recovery may take more than a YEAR.
**Occurrence of GBS after viral or bacterial illnesses suggests that the disease may be caused by an IMMUNE RESPONSE to infectious antigens that share epitopes with antigens on nerve cells in the body. Antibodies against the organism cross react with antigens on surface of myelinated nerves, causing demyelination. (shouldn’t they be looking at this type of immune response to a vaccination?)
Now again…GBS IS RARE!!!! AND IS RARE IN VACCINATION, the CDC said that the flu shot was only 1 in a million… …But it is possible: With that being said: If your child got GBS after vaccination…Would you continue to give vaccination…maybe just not that particular one…RIGHT? However you respond…Don’t you think, in the very least…You and your child should have a right to say: You know, maybe this particular shot isn’t worth the risk…After all GBS is rare…and my kid just got it…so something about their particular makeup might be causing this..
Could you get a medical exception…Maybe…but remember the CDC said it is completely justified for the FULL series to be done.
This is just me, but if my child got GBS after a vaccination…I wouldn’t do it again…and I don’t think any person has the right to “force” me to vaccinate my child…for the “greater good” of preventing communicable diseases that in all likely hood would have been eradicated had they been allowed to live out their natural life cycle or in the very least we as humans would have been able to fight it off naturally: Think of the Common Cold.
Food for thought: Before you are feared into taking away the rights of some…remember with each and every vaccination we all take a risk…and should you find yourself in the above question…Would you really want the masses to tell you that You HAVE to give your child the next shot…
As you can see this is not a black and white issue…and should not be treated as such. Medicine is neither good nor bad…it is a very personal thing…VERY personal….and should remain a personal decision.
In the end, I am not asking anyone NOT to vaccinate….I am just asking you NOT to ever take away my right to refuse a vaccination. This is a decision that should be left up to me, my child and my doctor….Not a panel of people who can and are often manipulated by money.
In closing: Do you believe that people should have the right to decide NOT to put something in their body, especially when it has been deemed unavoidably unsafe?
Have a lovely day!!!!